DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008056832-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2021-05-04

000114487

Contested design: 008056832-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant’s fixed costs of EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 0080568320001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Shenzhen Qiming Innovation Technology Development Co., Ltdvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

Room 609, Block A, Huafeng Internet Creative Park, No. 107 Gonghe Industrial Road, Longteng Community, Xixiang Street, Baoan District, Shenzhen, People’s Republic of China

Holder · RCD owner

Baoguang Lin

China (CN)

No. 90 Huangtou Village, Shijing Town, Lianjiang, Zhanjiang, Guangdong, People’s Republic of China

Represented by

IntellectPol IP Law Firm

Sławomir Krzysztof Nowicki

Prior art cited (1)

Registered RCD

brackets / mobile phone stand

RCD No 0079992710001 · Community Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2020-06-25

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character over earlier RCD No 0079992710001 and also invoked Article 25(1)(d) CDR.
  • The holder filed no observations in reply to the invalidity application.
  • The Division found the earlier RCD was disclosed by Bulletin publication before the contested filing date and accepted it as prior art under Article 7(1) CDR.
  • Given the broad designer freedom, the minor colour, line, and marking differences did not change the identical overall impression, so the contested design lacked individual character.
  • The application was upheld in full, the contested RCD was invalidated, and costs were awarded against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO
  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL
  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI-ALOISI

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

14.06

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130850

vs Michael AMARA

2026-04-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148
000131224

vs Shenzhen Ruixin Fengshuo Electronic Co., Ltd

2026-03-06REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148
000130970

vs Liu yanqiong

2026-02-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148
000131064

vs Jinfeng Min

2026-02-25REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148
000130524

vs Liu yanqiong

2026-02-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148
000129861

vs Liu yanqiong

2025-12-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148
000130564

vs Yunzeng He

2025-12-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148
000130565

vs Yunzeng He

2025-12-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148