DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 006906616-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2021-05-25

000114242

Contested design: 006906616-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 0069066160001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Banyan Licensing L.L.Cvia PDF extraction

United States (US)

1430-K West Pointe Drive Charlotte North Carolina 28214, United States of America

Holder · RCD owner

Xiaqian Mao

China (CN)

No. 18-4, Chaijiahu, Guangdu Village, Xiakou Town, 310000, Jiangshan City, Zhejiang Province, People’s Republic of China

Prior art cited (1)

Registered RCDD1

pillows

RCD No 0054905620002 · EUIPO Community Bulletin · disclosed 2018-07-11

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that the contested pillow design lacked individual character over earlier RCD D1, emphasising the same core triangular, split, indented, trapezoidal shape.
  • The holder filed no observations in response to the invalidity application.
  • The Division found D1 had been disclosed before the filing date and that designer freedom for relief pillows was not particularly limited.
  • It held that the similarities dominated the overall impression on the informed user, so the RCD lacked individual character and was declared invalid.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI-ALOISI
  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

06.09

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131404

vs Jiahe Lin

2026-05-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128578

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128655

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128637

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128735

vs OÜ REPSTON

2026-04-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000129372

vs Xuefang Cai

2026-03-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000130973

vs Højer Møbler A/S

2026-03-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000130975

vs Højer Møbler A/S

2026-03-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068