DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 005834462-0004

Invalidity · first instance · 2021-06-10

000109962

Contested design: 005834462-0004

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the registered Community design No 005834462-0004 is declared invalid, and the holder must bear the applicant's costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text(pl)

Wniosek o stwierdzenie nieważności zostaje podtrzymany. Stwierdza się nieważność zarejestrowanego wzoru wspólnotowego nr 005834462-0004. Właściciel ponosi koszty wnioskodawcy ustalone na kwotę 750 EUR.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Belini Polska sp. z o.o.via PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

Tabor Wielki 4b, 63-640 Tabor Wielki, Polska

Represented by

Kancelaria Patentowo-Prawna Venapatis

Ewa Gryc-Zerych

Holder · RCD owner

GiB Meble Gandecki i Berski Sp. Jawnavia PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

Mianowice 7A, 63-600 Kępno, Polska

Represented by

Marek Wiński

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

Meblościanka biała połysk front

https://www.facebook.com/meblebik/photos/a.1652289971456986/1653156618036988/?type=3&eid=ARCHEgWXQldJvHGZd5-FXgomOKrZiH0Ygz0BZ6Xdna1sYaTx_Txsb4VuDQY8eUBqxlr60Yura9BUO4OB&__tn__=EHH-R · Facebook page of furniture store BiK · disclosed 2017-09-12

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued the contested furniture-set design lacked novelty and individual character because identical earlier designs had been disclosed online before the filing date.
  • The holder challenged the reliability and authenticity of the internet evidence and requested suspension because related Polish court proceedings were still pending.
  • The Division accepted the Facebook disclosure, found it publicly accessible before filing, and treated the prior design image as sufficiently clear for comparison.
  • Given the broad designer freedom and the strong similarities in structure, layout, proportions, and appearance, the contested design created the same overall impression and lacked individual character.
  • The invalidity application was upheld, the contested RCD was declared invalid, and costs were awarded against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberAnna BAKALARZ
  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI-ALOISI

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
plPolishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

06.05

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131404

vs Jiahe Lin

2026-05-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128578

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128655

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128637

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128735

vs OÜ REPSTON

2026-04-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000129372

vs Xuefang Cai

2026-03-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000130973

vs Højer Møbler A/S

2026-03-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000130975

vs Højer Møbler A/S

2026-03-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068