DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 005834462-0010

Invalidity · first instance · 2021-06-15

000109883

Contested design: 005834462-0010

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld; Registered Community design No 005834462-0010 is declared invalid; the holder must bear the applicant's costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text(pl)

Wniosek o stwierdzenie nieważności zostaje podtrzymany. Stwierdza się nieważność zarejestrowanego wzoru wspólnotowego nr 005834462-0010. Właściciel ponosi koszty wnioskodawcy ustalone na kwotę 750 EUR.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Belini Polska sp. z o.o.via PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

Tabor Wielki 4b, 63-640 Tabor Wielki, Polska

Represented by

Kancelaria Patentowo-Prawna Venapatis

Ewa Gryc-Zerych

Holder · RCD owner

GiB Meble Gandecki i Berski Sp. Jawnavia PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

Mianowice 7A, 63-600 Kępno, Polska

Represented by

Marek Wiński

Prior art cited (2)

Web disclosure

Meblościanka CALABRIA zestaw 5

https://web.archive.org/web/20171027101635/https://meblohaus.pl/meble-pokojowe/meble-systemowe-do-salonu.html · Wayback Machine / meblohaus.pl · disclosed 2017-10-27

Web disclosure

Meble pokojowe Calabrini "1"

www.meble-jarocin.pl · Wayback Machine / meble-jarocin.pl · disclosed 2017-10-25

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued the contested furniture-set design lacked novelty and individual character because identical earlier designs had been disclosed online before filing.
  • The holder challenged the reliability of the internet evidence, especially Wayback Machine captures, and sought suspension pending related Polish court proceedings.
  • The Division accepted the web disclosures as publicly available before filing and found the earlier design sufficiently clear for comparison.
  • It held that minor differences such as feet and blue lighting did not alter the overall impression, so the contested design lacked individual character and was invalidated.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberAnna BAKALARZ
  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI-ALOISI

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
plPolishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

06.05

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131404

vs Jiahe Lin

2026-05-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128578

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128655

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128637

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128735

vs OÜ REPSTON

2026-04-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000129372

vs Xuefang Cai

2026-03-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000130973

vs Højer Møbler A/S

2026-03-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000130975

vs Højer Møbler A/S

2026-03-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068