DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 005834462-0003

Invalidity · first instance · 2021-06-15

000109963

Contested design: 005834462-0003

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, Registered Community design No 005834462-0003 is declared invalid, and the holder must bear the applicant's costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text(pl)

Wniosek o stwierdzenie nieważności zostaje podtrzymany. Stwierdza się nieważność zarejestrowanego wzoru wspólnotowego nr 005834462-0003. Właściciel ponosi koszty wnioskodawcy ustalone na kwotę 750 EUR.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Belini Polska sp. z o.o.via PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

Tabor Wielki 4b, 63-640 Tabor Wielki, Polska

Represented by

Kancelaria Patentowo-Prawna Venapatis

Ewa Gryc-Zerych

Holder · RCD owner

GiB Meble Gandecki i Berski Sp. Jawnavia PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

Mianowice 7A, 63-600 Kępno, Polska

Represented by

Marek Wiński

Prior art cited (2)

Web disclosure

Earlier furniture set design described as "C Zestaw NR 10"

https://web.archive.org/web/20171025022627/https://gibmeble.pl/pl · Wayback Machine / gibmeble.pl · disclosed 2017-10-25

Web disclosure

Same furniture set image described as "Meblościanka CALABRIA zestaw 10"

www.meblohaus.pl · Wayback Machine / meblohaus.pl · disclosed 2017-10-27

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying on earlier internet disclosures of the same furniture set before the filing date.
  • The holder disputed the reliability and authenticity of the online evidence, criticized Wayback Machine material, and requested suspension pending related Polish court proceedings.
  • The Invalidity Division accepted the Wayback Machine and notarial evidence as sufficient disclosure under Article 7(1) and found the earlier design publicly available before filing.
  • Given the broad designer freedom and near-identical overall impression, the contested design lacked individual character; the application was upheld and costs awarded against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberAnna BAKALARZ
  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI-ALOISI

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
plPolishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

06.05

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131404

vs Jiahe Lin

2026-05-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128637

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128578

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128655

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128735

vs OÜ REPSTON

2026-04-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000129372

vs Xuefang Cai

2026-03-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000130973

vs Højer Møbler A/S

2026-03-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000130975

vs Højer Møbler A/S

2026-03-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068