DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 007438650-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2021-06-15

000111561

Contested design: 007438650-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested Community design is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant's costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text(pl)

Wniosek o stwierdzenie nieważności zostaje podtrzymany. Stwierdza się nieważność zarejestrowanego wzoru wspólnotowego nr 007438650-0001. Właściciel ponosi koszty wnioskodawcy ustalone na kwotę 750 EUR.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Belini Polska sp. z o.o.via PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

Tabor Wielki 4b, 63-640 Tabor Wielki, Polska

Represented by

Kancelaria Patentowo-Prawna Venapatis

Ewa Gryc-Zerych

Holder · RCD owner

Przedsiębiorstwo Usługowo Handlowe Partner Anrallogin Rafał Kamińskivia PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

Sopel 8, 98-400 Wieruszów, Polska

Represented by

Marek Wiński

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

Biała meblościanka Lofter I

https://archiwum.allegro.pl/oferta/biala-mebloscianka-lofter-i-led-polysk-10-dni-i6769094861.html · Allegro · disclosed 2017-04-12

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued the contested furniture-set design lacked novelty and individual character because identical disclosures appeared on Allegro before the filing date.
  • The holder contested the internet evidence as one-sided, editable, low-quality, internally inconsistent, and unreliable, including material from web archiving services.
  • The Division accepted the Allegro disclosures as reliable public internet disclosures before 20 December 2019 and found the earlier design sufficiently clear for comparison.
  • Given the designer's broad freedom and the designs' near-identical structure, layout, proportions, and appearance, the contested design created the same overall impression.
  • The application was upheld, the RCD was invalidated for lack of individual character, and the Division did not examine the remaining grounds.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberAnna BAKALARZ
  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI-ALOISI

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
plPolishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

06.0406.05

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131404

vs Jiahe Lin

2026-05-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128578

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128655

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128637

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128735

vs OÜ REPSTON

2026-04-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000129372

vs Xuefang Cai

2026-03-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000130973

vs Højer Møbler A/S

2026-03-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000130975

vs Højer Møbler A/S

2026-03-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068