Invalidity · first instance · 2021-06-29
000109442
Contested design: 006083341-0002
Outcome
The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant's fixed costs of EUR 750.
Show verbatim operative text
1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 0060833410002 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.
CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750
Parties
Applicant · invalidity challenger
LEGO Juris A/Svia PDF extraction
Denmark (DK)
Koldingvej 2, 7190 Billund, Denmark
Represented by
Holder · RCD owner
GuangDong Qman Culture Communication Co., Ltd.
China (CN)
Unit 0811, 24F, Central Tower, No.5 Xiancun Road, Tianhe District, Guangzhou (Guangdong) 510623, People’s Republic of China
Represented by
Prior art cited (3)
LEGO figurine offer printout
http://amazon.co.uk; ASIN B01K8XHM2W · Amazon website · disclosed 2016-08-11
3D figurine mark
EUTM No 50 450 · EUTMs Bulletin · disclosed 1999-11-22
3D figurine mark
EUTM No 50 518 · EUTMs Bulletin · disclosed 1999-11-15
Legal grounds invoked
Argument summary
- ›The applicant argued the toy figure lacked individual character over its earlier LEGO minifigure disclosures and also conflicted with earlier 3D EUTMs.
- ›The holder said the applicant claimed an unprotectable style, designer freedom was limited by functional brick-figure constraints, and the head and body differences changed the overall impression.
- ›The Division treated the earlier 3D EUTM as a disclosed prior design, found broad designer freedom for humanoid brick-figure toys, and held the shared body, limbs, studs, slots and clamps dominated the comparison.
- ›The contested design did not create a different overall impression from D2, so it lacked individual character and was declared invalid; the Division did not examine the remaining grounds further.
Deciding panel
- MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI-ALOISI
- MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
- MemberMichelle Marie DELLACHERIE
Decision files
| Language | Type | Source link |
|---|---|---|
| esespañol (es) | machine translated | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
| frfrançais (fr) | machine translated | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
| ititaliano (it) | machine translated | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
| enEnglish | original | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
Locarno classes
Similar decisions
Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.
| Case | Date | Outcome | Shared grounds | Locarno | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 000131885 vs Zhenkai Cui | 2026-04-30 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 21 | 8 |
| 000129622 vs Squar3D Aps | 2026-04-29 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 21 | 8 |
| 000129681 vs Squar3D Aps | 2026-04-29 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 21 | 8 |
| 000126976 vs Dohány Kft. | 2026-04-08 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 21 | 8 |
| 000131547 vs Brandworl Management Co., Limited | 2026-04-07 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 21 | 8 |
| 000131507 vs Shenzhen Chenyu New Energy Technology Co., Ltd. | 2026-03-31 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 21 | 8 |
| 000130128 vs joboo GmbH | 2026-02-03 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 21 | 8 |
| 000130086 vs CROSS BORDEP (HK) CO., LIMITED | 2026-02-02 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 21 | 8 |