DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 003466663-0008

Invalidity · first instance · 2021-07-01

000114707

Contested design: 003466663-0008

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant's fixed costs of EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 003466663-0008 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Shenzhen Miledi Technology Co. Ltd.via PDF extraction

China (CN)

1301, Block B, TCL Building, No.006, Gaoxin South 1st Ave., South Area, Gaoxin Area, Yuehai St., Nanshan Dist., Shenzhen, People’s Republic of China

Represented by

Isabelle Bertaux

Holder · RCD owner

ShenZhen ZhuoQiong Technology Co. Ltd.via PDF extraction

China (CN)

RM3088, SEG Plaza, Huaqiang North Street, Futian District, Shenzhen, People’s Republic of China

Represented by

José Izquierdo Faces

Prior art cited (2)

Web disclosureAnnex 2

Showtec Kanjo Spot 10 LED moving head spot

https://www.thomann.de/intl/cn/showtec_kanjo_spot_10.htm · thomann.de

Web disclosureAnnex 3

Lixada Moving Head Light

ASIN B0168LVUSK · amazon.com · disclosed 2015-10-06

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying on earlier online disclosures of LED moving head spot designs and also invoking a trademark-based ground.
  • The holder filed no observations in reply.
  • The Division accepted the Thomann and Amazon webpages as prior public disclosures before the filing date and assessed individual character primarily against the Amazon-listed design D2.
  • It found the contested design and D2 created the same overall impression on the informed user, with only immaterial differences such as branding or unseen rear details.
  • The application was upheld in full, the RCD was declared invalid, and the holder was ordered to pay fixed costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila CELISOVA
  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO
  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI - ALOISI

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

26.05

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130945

vs Space Copenhagen Design ApS

2026-05-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131284

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131264

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131304

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131245

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131366

vs DANMAR TECH SL

2026-04-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131247

vs chao zhai

2026-04-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000129540

vs Ningbo Wilder Outdoor Products Co., Ltd.

2026-03-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268