DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 006111506-0003

Invalidity · first instance · 2021-07-05

000114492

Contested design: 006111506-0003

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant’s fixed costs of EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 0061115060003 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Nintendo of Europe GmbHvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Goldsteinstrasse 235, 60528 Frankfurt am Main, Germany

Represented by

Bardehle Pagenberg

Holder · RCD owner

Shenzhen Jieruihong Electronics Co., Ltdvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

(A Zone-1F, A Zone-2F,3F), Blk A, No 3, 88th, Longwangmiao Industrial Park, Baishixia, Fuyong St,Bao’an St, Shenzhen, People’s Republic of China

Prior art cited (2)

Web disclosureD1

Nintendo Switch Joy-Con controllers in blue and red

www.nintendo.co.uk/News/2017 · nintendo.co.uk

Web disclosureD2

Nintendo Switch Joy-Con controllers in grey

www.nintendo.co.uk/News/2017 · nintendo.co.uk

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4Article 6(1)Article 7

Argument summary

  • Applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character based mainly on earlier Nintendo Switch Joy-Con controller disclosures shown online before the filing date.
  • Holder filed no observations in reply to the invalidity application or the evidence of prior disclosure.
  • The Division accepted the Nintendo website printouts as solid evidence of prior public disclosure before the RCD filing date under Article 7 CDR.
  • It found the compared controllers created the same overall impression on the informed user, with only minor differences despite broad designer freedom in this sector.
  • The application was upheld, the RCD was declared invalid in full, and the holder was ordered to pay EUR 750 in costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO
  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL
  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI ALOISI

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

21.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131885

vs Zhenkai Cui

2026-04-30REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129622

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129681

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000126976

vs Dohány Kft.

2026-04-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131547

vs Brandworl Management Co., Limited

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131507

vs Shenzhen Chenyu New Energy Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-03-31REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130128

vs joboo GmbH

2026-02-03REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130086

vs CROSS BORDEP (HK) CO., LIMITED

2026-02-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218