DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008316624-0005

Invalidity · first instance · 2021-07-09

000114842

Contested design: 008316624-0005

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld and Registered Community design No 0083166240005 is declared invalid.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 0083166240005 is declared invalid.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €350

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

K-SPORT Polska Krzysztof Kafelvia PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

Rzepiennik Biskupi nr 214 poczta, Rzepiennik Strzyżewski, 33163 Rzepiennik Biskupi, Poland

Holder · RCD owner

Paweł Kalemba BD-Partnersvia PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

Klonowa, nr 20B, 47400 Racibórz, Poland

Represented by

Marcin Staniszewski

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

physical exercise and body-building apparatus with handles and cushions

www.k-sport.com.pl · www.k-sport.com.pl · disclosed 2019-12-15

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4Article 6(1)(b)Article 7

Argument summary

  • Applicant argued the contested RCD copied its earlier design, lacked novelty and individual character, and had been disclosed on the applicant's website before filing.
  • Holder filed no observations and did not rebut the applicant's evidence of prior web disclosure.
  • The Division accepted the website printouts as sufficient evidence that the prior design was publicly available by 15/12/2019 under Article 7 CDR.
  • Despite minor differences in cushions, bar shape, handles, colour and branding, the designs created the same overall impression on the informed user.
  • The application was upheld, the RCD was declared invalid for lack of individual character, and the holder was ordered to pay EUR 350 in costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO
  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL
  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI - ALOISI

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

21.02

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131885

vs Zhenkai Cui

2026-04-30REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129622

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129681

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000126976

vs Dohány Kft.

2026-04-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131547

vs Brandworl Management Co., Limited

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131507

vs Shenzhen Chenyu New Energy Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-03-31REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130128

vs joboo GmbH

2026-02-03REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130086

vs CROSS BORDEP (HK) CO., LIMITED

2026-02-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218