DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 005516952-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2021-07-12

000115122

Contested design: 005516952-0001

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The application for a declaration of invalidity against Registered Community design No 005516952-0001 is rejected, and the applicant must bear the holder's costs.

Show verbatim operative text(fr)

1. La demande en nullité à l’encontre du dessin ou modèle communautaire enregistré nº 005516952-0001 est rejetée. 2. La demanderesse supporte les frais de la titulaire.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

BMR Group société à responsabilité limitée à associé uniquevia PDF extraction

France (FR)

122 rue du Commandant Rolland Le Chambord 2, 13008 Marseille, France

Represented by

Legabrand

Holder · RCD owner

Sébastien Duhamelvia PDF extraction

France (FR)

3 avenue Font de Veyre, 06150 Cannes la Bocca, France

Prior art cited (21)

Web disclosureD1

food storage box

Amazon product B01NCNMT3A · Amazon · disclosed 2016-12-28

Web disclosureD2

food storage box

Amazon product B01I42TOSY · Amazon · disclosed 2016-08-06

National designD3

French registered design

French design No 877 743-001 · INPI · disclosed 1988-12-27

National designD4

French registered design

French design No 061708-001 · INPI · disclosed 2006-12-01

Web disclosureD5

hermetic food storage box with clips

Amazon product B01LZ5IA4J · Amazon · disclosed 2016-09-15

Web disclosureD6⚠ rejected as evidence

striated tray

Amazon product B0055YY2CI · Amazon · disclosed 2017-04-26

Web disclosureD7

striated tray

Amazon product B00EC5S63M · Amazon · disclosed 2013-12-18

Web disclosureD8

ridged tray

Leroy Merlin · disclosed 2017-03-30

Web disclosureD9

fast-food tray

Amazon product B00KISSXXK · Amazon · disclosed 2014-05-22

Web disclosureD10

food storage box

Amazon product B07V1J82CL · Amazon · disclosed 2019-07-09

Web disclosureD11

food storage box

Ikea product 601.496.73 · Ikea · disclosed 2021-02-11

Web disclosureD12

food storage box

Amazon product B07H5N9CK8 · Amazon · disclosed 2018-10-12

Web disclosureD13

fast-food trays

Amazon product B07RHVHV2R · Amazon · disclosed 2019-05-16

Web disclosureD14

window box

Packlinq product WMBG3 · Packlinq · disclosed 2021-02-11

Web disclosureD15

window food box

Self Packaging product 6116 · Self Packaging · disclosed 2021-02-11

Web disclosureD16

window food box

La Redoute · disclosed 2021-02-11

Web disclosureD17

food storage box

Amazon product B000V3SARQ · Amazon · disclosed 2007-05-15

Web disclosureD18

food storage box

Pradel France product 873 · Pradel France · disclosed 2021-02-11

Web disclosureD19

food storage box

Promobutler · disclosed 2021-02-11

Web disclosureD20

food storage box

Amazon · disclosed 2021-02-11

Web disclosureD21

food storage box

Jumia product PA446FD111TWGNAFAMZ · Jumia · disclosed 2021-02-11

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(a)Article 3(a)Article 25(1)(b)Article 8(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7

Argument summary

  • Applicant argued the contested food-container design was not clearly identifiable, lacked individual character over D1 to D9, and was composed solely of technically dictated features, relying on French registrations and internet disclosures.
  • Holder filed no observations and was undefended in the invalidity proceedings.
  • The Division found the registered views clearly showed a two-part food box, rejected the claim that the appearance was exclusively functional, and held the missing prior-art attachment could not be considered.
  • Comparing the contested design mainly with D1 and D2, the Division held the transparent concave upper part, striated lower tray, and bi-colour treatment created a different overall impression, so the application was rejected with costs against the applicant.

Deciding panel

  • MemberCarmen SÁNCHEZ PALOMARES
  • MemberJessica LEWIS
  • MemberMichelle Marie DELLACHERIE

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frFrenchoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

07.0709.03

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000116574

vs Horizons Group (London) Limited

2022-11-16Art 25(1)(b)07, 0910
000115907

vs SEDA INTERNATIONAL PACKAGING GROUP SPA

2022-02-09Art 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(a)099
000115908

vs SEDA INTERNATIONAL PACKAGING GROUP SPA

2022-02-08Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(a)099
000114521

vs CRIS-TIM COMPANIE DE FAMILIE SRL

2021-09-08Art 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(a)099
000000001

vs Franke Technology and Trademark Ltd

2019-08-06Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(a)079
000129481

vs Oro-Kong GmbH

2026-05-27Art 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(a)077
000129503

vs Oro-Kong GmbH

2026-05-26Art 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(a)077
000129483

vs Oro-Kong GmbH

2026-05-26Art 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(a)077