DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 000699194-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2019-08-06

000000001

Contested design: 000699194-0001

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The application for a declaration of invalidity against Registered Community design No. 0006991940001 is rejected, and the applicant must bear the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text(de)

1. Der Antrag auf Nichtigerklärung des eingetragenen Gemeinschaftsgeschmacksmusters Nr. 0006991940001 wird zurückgewiesen. 2. Die Antragstellerin trägt die Kosten der Inhaberin, die auf 400 EUR festgesetzt werden.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

XXXLutz KG

Austria (AT)

Römerstrasse 39, 4600 Wels, Österreich

Holder · RCD owner

Franke Technology and Trademark Ltd

Switzerland (CH)

Sonnenbergstraße 9, 6052 Hergiswil, Schweiz

Prior art cited (1)

National design

roll-up mat

Swiss Design No. 134 391 · Swiss design register

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(a)Article 3Article 25(1)(b)Article 8(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued the design was not a single design under Article 3 because the views allegedly showed different products, and claimed all essential features were solely technically dictated under Article 8(1).
  • The holder responded that all views depicted the same product and that the parallel rods and side bands were chosen for aesthetic effect as well as function.
  • The Division found view 7 was merely a photograph of the same rollable product, so the alleged discrepancies in color, relief, and spacing did not show different designs.
  • The Division also found the rods and side bands created a deliberate striped visual appearance, so exclusive technical function was not proven; the invalidity application was rejected and costs awarded against the applicant.

Deciding panel

  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO
  • MemberIngeborg MENDIETA VETTER

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
deGermanoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

07.04

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000115122

vs DUHAMEL SEBASTIEN

2021-07-12Art 25(1)(b), Art 25(1)(a)079
000108801

vs BERLIN PACKAGING FRANCE

2020-10-23Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)078
000000002

vs Franke Technology and Trademark Ltd

2019-08-06Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)078
000000003

vs Franke Technology and Trademark Ltd

2019-08-06Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)078
000010924

vs Novelis Deutschland GmbH

2019-06-28Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)078
000101841

vs Richard Andrews

2019-06-25Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)078
000102859

vs Syzan Sp. z o.o.

2019-04-25Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)078
000103839

vs SEMIR RAAD MAROKI

2019-02-25Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)078