DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 003850601-0029

Invalidity · first instance · 2019-02-25

000103839

Contested design: 003850601-0029

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application is rejected, and the applicant must bear the holder's costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered Community design No 0038506010029 is rejected. 2. The applicant bears the holder’s costs.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

SC Gold Glass S.r.l.via PDF extraction

Romania (RO)

Str. Lt. Col. Dumitru Papazoglu, No 60, Bucharest, Romania

Holder · RCD owner

Semir Raad Marokivia PDF extraction

Romania (RO)

str. Faurei No 5, Bucharest, Romania

Represented by

Claudia Monica Frisch

Prior art cited (2)

Prior use⚠ rejected as evidence

glass plate and vintage glassware models allegedly sold on the international market

invoices, delivery orders and import documents involving SC Gold Glass S.r.l. and Pyramid Glass Company S.A.E. · disclosed 2015-11-09

Registered RCD⚠ rejected as evidence

crystal glassware

RCD No 004144525-0005 · Community Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2017-08-16

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4Article 5Article 6Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that the contested glass plate had long been sold on the market and lacked novelty and individual character.
  • To prove earlier disclosure, the applicant filed invoices, delivery and import documents, a Pyramid Glass document and RCD No 004144525-0005.
  • The holder filed no observations in reply.
  • The Division found the untranslated French documents inadmissible and the remaining evidence too unclear or too late to prove pre-filing disclosure.
  • Because no earlier design was validly disclosed before the filing date, the invalidity application was rejected and costs were awarded against the applicant.

Deciding panel

  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI-ALOISI
  • MemberBirgit FILTENBORG
  • MemberJose Antonio GARRIDO OTAOLA

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

07.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000108801

vs BERLIN PACKAGING FRANCE

2020-10-23Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)078
000000002

vs Franke Technology and Trademark Ltd

2019-08-06Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)078
000000003

vs Franke Technology and Trademark Ltd

2019-08-06Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)078
000000001

vs Franke Technology and Trademark Ltd

2019-08-06Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)078
000010924

vs Novelis Deutschland GmbH

2019-06-28Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)078
000101841

vs Richard Andrews

2019-06-25Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)078
000102859

vs Syzan Sp. z o.o.

2019-04-25Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)078
000103919

vs SEMIR RAAD MAROKI

2019-01-31Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)078