Invalidity · first instance · 2019-01-31
000103919
Contested design: 003850601-0002
Outcome
The invalidity application is rejected as inadmissible, and the invalidity fee will not be refunded.
Show verbatim operative text
1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is rejected as inadmissible. 2. The fee for the application for a declaration of invalidity will not be refunded.
CostsNo costs order
Parties
Applicant · invalidity challenger
SC GOLD GLASS S.R.L.via PDF extraction
Romania (RO)
Str. Lt. Col. Dumitru Papazoglu, Nr. 60, Et. 2, Ap. 10, Sector 3, 031203 Bucharest, Romania
Holder · RCD owner
SEMIR RAAD MAROKI
Romania (RO)
Str. Faurei nr 5, bloc C9, sc. C, ap. 82, Bucharest, Romania
Legal grounds invoked
Argument summary
- ›Applicant sought invalidity of RCD No 003850601-0002 for lack of novelty and individual character under Article 25(1)(b), invoking Articles 5 and 6 CDR.
- ›No holder observations are recorded; the decision resolves the case on admissibility rather than on the substantive invalidity grounds.
- ›The Division found the application lacked reproductions of the earlier design(s) and proof of disclosure, and the applicant did not cure that deficiency after invitation.
- ›The application was rejected as inadmissible, and the invalidity fee was not refunded.
Deciding panel
- MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL
- MemberGaile SAKALAITÉ
- MemberIngeborg MENDIETA VETTER
Decision files
| Language | Type | Source link |
|---|---|---|
| esespañol (es) | machine translated | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
| frfrançais (fr) | machine translated | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
| ititaliano (it) | machine translated | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
| enEnglish | original | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
Locarno classes
Similar decisions
Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.
| Case | Date | Outcome | Shared grounds | Locarno | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 000108801 vs BERLIN PACKAGING FRANCE | 2020-10-23 | Invalidity application rejected | Art 25(1)(b) | 07 | 8 |
| 000000002 vs Franke Technology and Trademark Ltd | 2019-08-06 | Invalidity application rejected | Art 25(1)(b) | 07 | 8 |
| 000000003 vs Franke Technology and Trademark Ltd | 2019-08-06 | Invalidity application rejected | Art 25(1)(b) | 07 | 8 |
| 000000001 vs Franke Technology and Trademark Ltd | 2019-08-06 | Invalidity application rejected | Art 25(1)(b) | 07 | 8 |
| 000010924 vs Novelis Deutschland GmbH | 2019-06-28 | Invalidity application rejected | Art 25(1)(b) | 07 | 8 |
| 000101841 vs Richard Andrews | 2019-06-25 | Invalidity application rejected | Art 25(1)(b) | 07 | 8 |
| 000102859 vs Syzan Sp. z o.o. | 2019-04-25 | Invalidity application rejected | Art 25(1)(b) | 07 | 8 |
| 000103839 vs SEMIR RAAD MAROKI | 2019-02-25 | Invalidity application rejected | Art 25(1)(b) | 07 | 8 |