DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 000699194-0002

Invalidity · first instance · 2019-08-06

000000002

Contested design: 000699194-0002

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The application for a declaration of invalidity is rejected, and the applicant must bear the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text(de)

1. Der Antrag auf Nichtigerklärung des eingetragenen Gemeinschaftsgeschmacksmusters Nr. 0006991940002 wird zurückgewiesen. 2. Die Antragstellerin trägt die Kosten der Inhaberin, die auf 400 EUR festgesetzt werden.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

XXXLutz KG

Austria (AT)

Römerstrasse 39, 4600 Wels, Österreich

Holder · RCD owner

Franke Technology and Trademark Ltd

Switzerland (CH)

Sonnenbergstraße 9, 6052 Hergiswil, Schweiz

Prior art cited (1)

National design

roll mat

Swiss Design No. 134 391 · Swiss design register

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 8(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that the contested design's essential features were solely dictated by technical function and described the product as a roll mat or draining grid rather than a cutting board.
  • The holder replied that the parallel rods and side bands reflected aesthetic design choices, produced a distinctive striped appearance, and were not a standard crossed-grid structure.
  • The Division held that the registered product indication remained a cutting board and found that, even if used as a roll mat, the selected rods and connecting bands also embodied aesthetic considerations.
  • Because the applicant did not prove that all essential features were chosen exclusively for technical function, the invalidity application was rejected and costs were awarded against the applicant.

Deciding panel

  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO
  • MemberIngeborg MENDIETA VETTER

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
deGermanoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

07.04

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000108801

vs BERLIN PACKAGING FRANCE

2020-10-23Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)078
000000001

vs Franke Technology and Trademark Ltd

2019-08-06Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)078
000000003

vs Franke Technology and Trademark Ltd

2019-08-06Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)078
000010924

vs Novelis Deutschland GmbH

2019-06-28Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)078
000101841

vs Richard Andrews

2019-06-25Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)078
000102859

vs Syzan Sp. z o.o.

2019-04-25Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)078
000103839

vs SEMIR RAAD MAROKI

2019-02-25Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)078
000103919

vs SEMIR RAAD MAROKI

2019-01-31Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(b)078