DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 007307475-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2021-07-23

000114486

Contested design: 007307475-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must bear the applicant's fixed costs of EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design 0073074750001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Xiaoe Huangvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

No.1, building 18, group 1, Kuli Village, Shishi Town, Yifeng County Yichun City, Jiangxi Province, People's Republic of China

Holder · RCD owner

Shenzhen Sailvan Network Technology Co., Ltd

China (CN)

NO.6C009-6C012, China South City International leather raw materials logistics area Phase II, 1 Huanan Avenue, Pinghu Road, Longgang District, Shenzhen, People's Republic of China

Represented by

ZHAOffice SPRL

Prior art cited (3)

National designD1

speaker

Chinese design patent No 304578140 S · China National Intellectual Property Administration · disclosed 2018-04-10

Web disclosure

Portable Bluetooth Speakers 24W Waterproof IPX7

ASIN B082DZ2S7X · Amazon.es · disclosed 2019-09-09

Web disclosureD2

Wireless Speaker Bluetooth, COOCHEER 24W

ASIN B07Y382CL2 · Amazon.com · disclosed 2019-09-18

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 6(2)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying on a Chinese design patent and Amazon product listings for similar speakers disclosed before the RCD filing date.
  • The holder filed no observations in reply.
  • The Division accepted the Chinese patent extract and the Amazon.com listing as sufficient proof of prior disclosure and found the informed user could directly compare the speaker designs.
  • Because the contested design reproduced the prior design's features and colour differences were immaterial, the RCD lacked individual character and was declared invalid.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila CELISOVA
  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO
  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI - ALOISI

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

14.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130850

vs Michael AMARA

2026-04-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148
000131224

vs Shenzhen Ruixin Fengshuo Electronic Co., Ltd

2026-03-06REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148
000130970

vs Liu yanqiong

2026-02-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148
000131064

vs Jinfeng Min

2026-02-25REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148
000130524

vs Liu yanqiong

2026-02-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148
000129861

vs Liu yanqiong

2025-12-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148
000130564

vs Yunzeng He

2025-12-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148
000130565

vs Yunzeng He

2025-12-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148