DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 005795648-0002

Invalidity · first instance · 2021-08-09

000114866

Contested design: 005795648-0002

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must bear the applicant’s costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 0057956480002 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Shenzhen Jinyu E-Commerce Co., Ltd.via PDF extraction

China (CN)

Room 703, F7, Hangsheng Business Center, Dongbin Road, Nanshan Street, Nanshan District, Shenzhen, Guangdong, People’s Republic of China

Represented by

Alberto Maria Giordano

Holder · RCD owner

Xiamen Bandian Originality technology co., LTD.via PDF extraction

China (CN)

Unit B, 3rd Floor, 1709-1, Dianqian Community, Huli District, Xiamen, People’s Republic of China

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosureD1

TECBOSS LED Rechargeable Night Light

ASIN B074W2ZQ2G; ASIN B07F3TNKQV · Amazon.co.uk / Amazon.com · disclosed 2017-08-16

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying on earlier Amazon disclosures of a TECBOSS rechargeable night light before the RCD filing date.
  • The holder filed no observations in reply to the invalidity application.
  • The Division accepted the Amazon listings as proof of disclosure under Article 7 and treated them jointly as D1 because they showed the same TECBOSS light.
  • It found the contested design created the same overall impression as D1, so the application was upheld and the RCD was declared invalid.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila CELISOVA
  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO
  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI - ALOISI

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

26.05

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130945

vs Space Copenhagen Design ApS

2026-05-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131284

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131264

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131304

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131245

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131366

vs DANMAR TECH SL

2026-04-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131247

vs chao zhai

2026-04-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000129540

vs Ningbo Wilder Outdoor Products Co., Ltd.

2026-03-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268