DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 006081691-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2021-08-13

000115061

Contested design: 006081691-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant's costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 0060816910001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Xiaodong Linvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

2509, Green Garden Court, Lvzhou Fenghe Home Shixia North One Street Futian District, Shenzhen, Guangdong, People’s Republic of China

Represented by

Alberto Maria Giordano

Holder · RCD owner

Design Identification PTE, LTD.via PDF extraction

SG

Blk 10, Ubi Crescent, #05-21 Ubi Techpark, Lobby B, Singapore, 408564, Singapore

Prior art cited (2)

PatentD1

Chinese design patent for a lamp in the form of a miniature bonsai tree

CN303845977S · Chinese design patent publication · disclosed 2016-09-07

Web disclosureD2

Amazon listing for the Masdio Light of Tree lamp

https://www.amazon.com; ASIN B07 6Y5 X97Y · Amazon · disclosed 2017-10-28

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying on a Chinese design patent and Amazon product listing predating the RCD filing.
  • The holder filed no observations in reply and left the invalidity application undefended on the merits.
  • The Division accepted disclosure of the prior design evidence and found the informed user would receive the same overall impression from the compared lamp designs.
  • Given the designer's broad freedom and the substantial visual similarity, the RCD lacked individual character over D1.
  • The application was upheld, the RCD was declared invalid, and costs were awarded against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila CELISOVA
  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO
  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI - ALOISI

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

26.05

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130945

vs Space Copenhagen Design ApS

2026-05-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131284

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131264

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131304

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131245

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131366

vs DANMAR TECH SL

2026-04-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131247

vs chao zhai

2026-04-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000129540

vs Ningbo Wilder Outdoor Products Co., Ltd.

2026-03-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268