DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 005517547-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2021-09-08

000115546

Contested design: 005517547-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant's fixed costs of EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 005517547-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

b27 Concepts Limitedvia PDF extraction

United Kingdom (GB)

127 Sewell Road London, London, City of London SE2 9DH, United Kingdom

Represented by

Reddie & Grose B.V.

Holder · RCD owner

Xing Suvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

Room 603, 3 door, No. 66, Dengziqiao Lane, Kaifu District, Changsha City, 410005, People’s Republic of China

Prior art cited (3)

Web disclosureD1

'Ecoee Original' teapot

ASIN B01NBSQUTB · www.amazon.de · disclosed 2017-01-09

Web disclosureD2

'Buntfink' teapot

ASIN B0796VZK4Q · www.amazon.de · disclosed 2018-01-21

Web disclosureD3

'Ecoee Original' teapot

ASIN B079N4QXNN · www.amazon.de · disclosed 2018-02-06

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character over three earlier teapot disclosures sold on Amazon.de as D1, D2 and D3.
  • The holder filed no observations and left the invalidity application undefended.
  • The Division accepted the Amazon listings as valid prior disclosures under Article 7 and, for procedural economy, assessed novelty against D2 alone.
  • Excluding non-claimed features such as lid, filter, contents and transparency, the contested design was identical to D2, so the RCD was declared invalid and costs awarded against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberRasa BARAKAUSKIENĖ

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

07.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131632

vs DETECTALIA EUROPE, S.L.U.

2026-05-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000129741

vs 2W ORGANIC

2026-05-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131788

vs Liu Xiaoxia

2026-05-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131628

vs Shenzhen Changhe Technology Co., Ltd

2026-04-30REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131704

vs Shenzhen Changhe Technology Co., Ltd

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131745

vs Huan Wang

2026-04-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000130924

vs SOHAI HOUSEWARES CO.,LTD.

2026-04-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131546

vs Foshan Changyuansheng Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-03-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078