DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008247787-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2021-09-10

000115362

Contested design: 008247787-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant's fixed costs of EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 008247787-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the applicant's costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Portbird UGvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Ebereschenweg 23, 50767 Köln, Germany

Holder · RCD owner

Shanxi Xuanli Technology Co., Ltd.

China (CN)

23rd Floor, East District, Hexin Commercial Building, No.705 Changfeng Street, Xiaodian District, Taiyuan City, People’s Republic of China

Represented by

Marinos Cleanthous

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosureA2/A5

Scott Klinker's 'corner bright light' floor lamp

Instagram post by 'scottklinkerdesign' and www.scottklinker.com · Instagram / scottklinker.com · disclosed 2018-05-24

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued the contested floor-lamp design lacked novelty and individual character over Scott Klinker's earlier “corner bright light”, disclosed online before the filing date through Instagram and a website.
  • The holder filed no observations in response to the invalidity application.
  • The Division accepted the internet evidence as proving prior disclosure under Article 7(1) CDR before 4 November 2020.
  • With average designer freedom for floor lamps, the designs shared the same essential shape, proportions, and arrangement, so minor colour differences did not change the overall impression.
  • The application succeeded under Article 25(1)(b) in conjunction with Articles 4(1) and 6(1)(b) CDR; the RCD was declared invalid and costs were awarded against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI - ALOISI

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

26.05

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130945

vs Space Copenhagen Design ApS

2026-05-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131284

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131264

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131304

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131245

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131366

vs DANMAR TECH SL

2026-04-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131247

vs chao zhai

2026-04-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000129540

vs Ningbo Wilder Outdoor Products Co., Ltd.

2026-03-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268