DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008043293-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2021-09-14

000114081

Contested design: 008043293-0001

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application is rejected, and the applicant must bear the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered Community design No 008043293-0001 is rejected. 2. The applicant bears the holder’s costs, fixed at EUR 400.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Confecciones Cabanillas, S.L.via PDF extraction

Spain (ES)

Caballeros Jerusalén, 10, 31511 Cabanillas (Navarrra), Spain

Holder · RCD owner

Original Buff, S.A.via PDF extraction

Spain (ES)

França 16, 08700, Igualada (Barcelona), Spain

Represented by

Currell Suñol S.L.P.

Prior art cited (4)

Registered RCD

Earlier Community design invoked by the applicant.

RCD 007845003-0001 · EUIPO · disclosed 2020-05-05

Registered RCD

Earlier Community design invoked by the applicant.

RCD 007845003-0002 · EUIPO · disclosed 2020-05-05

Registered RCD

Earlier Community design invoked by the applicant.

RCD 007845003-0003 · EUIPO · disclosed 2020-05-05

Utility model

Spanish utility model invoked by the applicant.

U202030699 · Spanish Office for Patents and Trade Marks · disclosed 2020-06-12

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(d)Article 25(3)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity under Article 25(1)(d) CDR based on three earlier RCDs and one Spanish utility model.
  • The holder argued that none of the cited rights qualified as prior designs under Article 25(1)(d) and, in any event, the contested design was new and had individual character.
  • The Division held that Article 25(1)(d) must be interpreted restrictively: the earlier RCDs had been published before the contested design's filing date, and the utility model was not a qualifying prior design.
  • Because the only invoked invalidity ground was not met, the application was rejected and the applicant was ordered to pay EUR 400 in costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI - ALOISI

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

29.02

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000115204

vs U-Earth Biotech Ltd

2022-01-28295
000115163

vs U-Earth Biotech Ltd

2022-01-28295
000115205

vs U-Earth Biotech Ltd

2022-01-28295
000126496

vs Jiangmen Xinhui Zhenghua Ironware Co., Ltd.

2025-03-07Art 25(1)(d)4
000122734

vs Changjiang Xutangrui Technology Co., Ltd.

2024-06-05Art 25(1)(d)4
000122955

vs Jun Yu

2024-02-26Art 25(1)(d)4
000121322

vs Shenzhen Hongshi Trading Co., Ltd.

2024-02-15Art 25(1)(d)4
000119078

vs Sijie XU

2023-10-25Art 25(1)(d)4