DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 005945193-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2023-10-25

000119078

Contested design: 005945193-0001

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application is rejected, and the applicant must pay the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered Community design No 0059451930001 is rejected. 2. The applicant bears the holder’s costs, fixed at EUR 400.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Shenzhen Burn Technology, Ltdvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

Room 1902 Block A, Dream City, East Modern City, Nanhai Avenue, Nanshan District, Shenzhen, China

Represented by

Asternery S.L.

Holder · RCD owner

Sijie Xuvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

No. 10 Magongzai, Donghai Tn., Lufeng City, Guangdong Province, China

Represented by

Karel Mul

Prior art cited (1)

Registered RCD

massage apparatus

RCD No 0060856430001; Chinese application No 2018305130212 · Office's Bulletin · disclosed 2019-03-20

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(d)Article 41Article 5(2)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity under Article 25(1)(d) CDR based on its later-filed RCD No 0060856430001 claiming priority from a Chinese design application dated 12/09/2018.
  • The holder filed no observations in response to the invalidity application.
  • The Division held the claimed priority was invalid because the Chinese priority document showed the design in greyscale while the cited RCD claimed colour, which was not an immaterial difference.
  • Without a valid priority date, the cited RCD was not an earlier protected right before the contested design filing date, so the invalidity application was rejected.

Deciding panel

  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO
  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO
  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

28.03

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000115627

vs Shenzhen Qianyu Technology Co., Ltd.

2021-09-16Art 25(1)(d)287
000113143

vs Shenzhen Hongwang Nicemay Electric Co., Ltd

2021-08-26Art 25(1)(d)287
000125115

vs Mihua Li

2024-07-31285
000123998

vs Shenzhen First Century Technology Co., Ltd.

2024-05-16285
000122441

vs Piotr Malinowski

2024-05-15285
000120698

vs Guangdong Roman Technology Co., Ltd

2024-01-25285
000108601

vs Wahl Clipper Corporation

2023-07-31285
000120778

vs GUANGDONG HUANENGDA ELECTRICAL APPLIANCES CO.,LTD.

2023-07-17285