DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 007735758-0004

Invalidity · first instance · 2023-07-17

000120778

Contested design: 007735758-0004

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application is rejected, and the applicant must bear the holder's costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered Community design No 007735758-0004 is rejected. 2. The applicant bears the holder’s costs.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

GA.MA S.R.L.via PDF extraction

Italy (IT)

Via Sant'Alberto 1714, 40018 San Pietro in Casale (BO), Italy

Represented by

ACCAPI S.R.L.

Holder · RCD owner

Guangdong Huanengda Electrical Appliances Co., LTD.via PDF extraction

China (CN)

West of Dongsanzhi Road, Airport Economic Zone, Jieyang City, Guangdong Province, China

Prior art cited (2)

International designD1

IQ Perfetto hair dryer

DM/103 462 · International Designs Bulletin No 44/2018

Web disclosureD2

IQ Perfetto hair dryer shown in Facebook posts and YouTube video

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MK3bJjTmBR0&t=22s · Facebook and YouTube · disclosed 2019-03-16

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of individual character, relying on its earlier IQ Perfetto hair dryer disclosed through an international design registration and online posts.
  • The holder filed no observations in response to the invalidity application.
  • The Division accepted disclosure of both prior designs D1 and D2 and found only limited constraints on hair-dryer design, but identified visible structural and positional differences from the contested design.
  • Because those differences produced a different overall impression on the informed user, the contested design retained individual character and the application was rejected.

Deciding panel

  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO
  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

28.03

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000125115

vs Mihua Li

2024-07-31Art 25(1)(b)287
000123998

vs Shenzhen First Century Technology Co., Ltd.

2024-05-16Art 25(1)(b)287
000122441

vs Piotr Malinowski

2024-05-15Art 25(1)(b)287
000120698

vs Guangdong Roman Technology Co., Ltd

2024-01-25Art 25(1)(b)287
000108601

vs Wahl Clipper Corporation

2023-07-31Art 25(1)(b)287
000120758

vs Zhaojie Zhang

2023-07-13Art 25(1)(b)287
000119939

vs 900

2023-06-09Art 25(1)(b)287
000119166

vs Salon Europe Limited

2023-06-09Art 25(1)(b)287