DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 015041944-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2024-07-31

000125115

Contested design: 015041944-0001

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application is rejected, and the applicant must pay the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered Community design No 0150419440001 is rejected. 2. The applicant bears the holder’s costs, fixed at EUR 400.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Kuansheng Wangvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

No.52, Group 2, Yong'an Village, Qingfeng Town, Jianhu County, Yancheng City, Jiangsu Province, China

Represented by

Metida

Holder · RCD owner

Mihua Li

China (CN)

No. 99, Shuqi Village, Huaqiao Town, Sanmen County, Zhejiang Province, China

Represented by

Francesco Zofrea

Prior art cited (2)

Web disclosure

Shein offer for a 'Rechargeable Portable Men's Hair Trimmer, Black Dragon Shaped'

https://us.shein.com · Shein website · disclosed 2023-09-26

Web disclosure

1688 offers showing the same hair clipper image with accessories

https://1688.com · 1688 website · disclosed 2023-08-29

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 5(1)(b)Article 5(2)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty, arguing that an identical hair clipper design had already been disclosed online before the filing date.
  • The holder filed no observations in response to the invalidity application.
  • The Invalidity Division accepted the Shein webpage as prior disclosure from at least 26/09/2023, but found the prior design was shown only from one side while the contested design disclosed additional visible features.
  • Because those additional undisclosed features were not immaterial details, the prior design was not identical and the novelty attack under Article 5(1)(b) failed.

Deciding panel

  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL
  • MemberRasa BARAKAUSKIENĖ

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

28.06

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000123998

vs Shenzhen First Century Technology Co., Ltd.

2024-05-16Art 25(1)(b)287
000122441

vs Piotr Malinowski

2024-05-15Art 25(1)(b)287
000120698

vs Guangdong Roman Technology Co., Ltd

2024-01-25Art 25(1)(b)287
000108601

vs Wahl Clipper Corporation

2023-07-31Art 25(1)(b)287
000120778

vs GUANGDONG HUANENGDA ELECTRICAL APPLIANCES CO.,LTD.

2023-07-17Art 25(1)(b)287
000120758

vs Zhaojie Zhang

2023-07-13Art 25(1)(b)287
000119166

vs Salon Europe Limited

2023-06-09Art 25(1)(b)287
000119939

vs 900

2023-06-09Art 25(1)(b)287