DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008212914-0004

Invalidity · first instance · 2021-09-16

000115510

Contested design: 008212914-0004

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant’s costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 008212914-0004 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Xiaolong Yangvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

Group 2, Songyuan Village, Nanwan Township, Hengdong County Hunan 421400, People’s Republic of China

Holder · RCD owner

Aimo Marking Co., Ltd.via PDF extraction

China (CN)

28532, Rm. 105, 6 Baohua Rd., Hengqin New Area Zhuhai, People’s Republic of China

Represented by

Ákos Süle

Prior art cited (3)

Web disclosureAnnex 1

Aken replacement LetraTag plastic label tape cartridge

https://www.amazon.co.uk/Equivalent-LetraTag-Plastic-S0721610-LT-100H/dp/B06XRB4CYY/ref=sr_1_1?dchild=1&keywords=B06XRB4CYY&qid=1616713946&sr=8-1 · Amazon.co.uk · disclosed 2018-05-31

Web disclosureAnnex 2

Oozmas replacement LetraTag plastic label tape cartridge

https://www.amazon.co.uk/6-Pack-Replacement-LetraTag-Plastic-LT-110T/dp/B06VTTGD6H/ref=sr_1_1?dchild=1&keywords=B06VTTGD6H&qid=1616714087&sr=8-1 · Amazon.co.uk · disclosed 2016-12-20

National designAnnex 3

Chinese design patent for “Label Ribbon carriage (LT-12mm)”

CN304030241 S · Chinese Patent Office · disclosed 2017-02-08

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying on two Amazon disclosures and a Chinese design patent for similar label-tape cartridges.
  • The holder filed no observations in reply.
  • The Division accepted publication of Chinese design patent CN304030241 S as prior disclosure under Article 7 and, for procedural economy, did not assess the other evidence.
  • Comparing the cartridge designs side by side, the Division found no different overall impression on the informed user, so the RCD lacked individual character and was invalidated.

Deciding panel

  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI - ALOISI
  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

14.02

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130850

vs Michael AMARA

2026-04-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148
000131224

vs Shenzhen Ruixin Fengshuo Electronic Co., Ltd

2026-03-06REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148
000130970

vs Liu yanqiong

2026-02-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148
000131064

vs Jinfeng Min

2026-02-25REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148
000130524

vs Liu yanqiong

2026-02-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148
000129861

vs Liu yanqiong

2025-12-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148
000130565

vs Yunzeng He

2025-12-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148
000130564

vs Yunzeng He

2025-12-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148