DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 007661178-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2021-09-20

000112021

Contested design: 007661178-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 0076611780001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Nat design s.r.o.via PDF extraction

SK

Slovenskej jednoty 81/1, 04001 Košice, Slovakia

Holder · RCD owner

Sonnenberg Manufaktur AGvia PDF extraction

Switzerland (CH)

Hinterbergstrasse 56, 6312 Steinhausen, Switzerland

Represented by

David Karabec

Prior art cited (2)

Unregistered CD

Saffron 'Authentica' bed shown in Czech commercial leaflet and sales manual

Czech commercial leaflet

Unregistered CD

Saffron 'Sophia' bed shown in product catalogue and Czech leaflet

Czech commercial leaflet · disclosed 2013-07-01

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued the contested bed design copied its earlier Saffron beds and lacked individual character, relying on catalogues, leaflets, a sales manual, and an invoice showing prior market disclosure.
  • The holder said its design resulted from independent development, used different colours and stripe details, and would create a different overall impression for attentive purchasers of high-end beds.
  • The Division accepted disclosure of the earlier Authentica and Sophia beds before the 4 February 2020 filing date and treated bad-faith and unfair-competition allegations as outside Article 25(1) CDR.
  • Comparing the contested design mainly with the earlier Authentica bed, the Division found the similarities in shape, composition, and striped appearance outweighed the colour and minor detail differences, so invalidity was upheld.

Deciding panel

  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI-ALOISI
  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberMichelle Marie DELLACHERIE

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

06.02

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131404

vs Jiahe Lin

2026-05-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128578

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128655

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128637

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128735

vs OÜ REPSTON

2026-04-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000129372

vs Xuefang Cai

2026-03-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000130973

vs Højer Møbler A/S

2026-03-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000130975

vs Højer Møbler A/S

2026-03-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068