DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008028385-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2021-10-25

000113581

Contested design: 008028385-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld, the contested Community design No. 0080283850001 is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text(de)

1. Dem Antrag auf Nichtigerklärung wird stattgegeben. 2. Das eingetragene Gemeinschaftsgeschmacksmuster Nr. 0080283850001 wird für nichtig erklärt. 3. Die Inhaberin trägt die Kosten, die auf 750 EUR festgesetzt werden.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

LEGO Juris A/Svia PDF extraction

Denmark (DK)

Koldingvej 2, 7190 Dänemark

Represented by

Bomhard IP, S.L.

Holder · RCD owner

Guangdong Xingbao Electronic Technology Co., Ltd.

China (CN)

Longtan Industrial Area, Shangxiang Village, Lianshang Town, Chenghai District, Shantou City, Guangdong Province, Volksrepublik China

Represented by

Nlo Schieldmark B.V.

Prior art cited (1)

International designD1

Spielfigur

Internationales Geschmacksmuster Nr. DM/076470-0019 · Blatt für internationale Geschmacksmuster · disclosed 2011-08-31

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of individual character over earlier designs, relying mainly on international design D1 and also alleging unfair copying.
  • The holder argued the contested toy figure was new and had individual character, cited a crowded prior art field, and denied any bad-faith appropriation.
  • The Division treated later-invoked Chinese and Ukrainian designs and unfair-conduct allegations as inadmissible, and accepted D1 as validly disclosed prior art.
  • It found broad designer freedom for toy figures, rejected the claimed market saturation, and held the similarities with D1 created the same overall impression.
  • The invalidity application was upheld, the contested design was declared invalid, and the holder was ordered to pay EUR 750 in costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO
  • MemberIvanka IVANOVA

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
deGermanoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

21.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131885

vs Zhenkai Cui

2026-04-30REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129622

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129681

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000126976

vs Dohány Kft.

2026-04-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131547

vs Brandworl Management Co., Limited

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131507

vs Shenzhen Chenyu New Energy Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-03-31REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130128

vs joboo GmbH

2026-02-03REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130086

vs CROSS BORDEP (HK) CO., LIMITED

2026-02-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218