DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 002752709-0002

Invalidity · first instance · 2021-10-25

000113643

Contested design: 002752709-0002

CDRRCD lapsed at decision

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 002752709-0002 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

DÁM Kft.via PDF extraction

Hungary (HU)

Üde utca 4., 1037 Budapest, Hungary

Represented by

SBGK Ügyvédi Iroda

Holder · RCD owner

Adamo-Hammock

Hungary (HU)

Pusztaszeri u. 2., 6647 Csanytelek, Hungary

Prior art cited (6)

National designD1

baby hammock

French national design No 982205-0001 · Designview · disclosed 1998-08-21

Patent⚠ rejected as evidence

WO No 2013088432A1

Patent⚠ rejected as evidence

US No 1950042A

Patent⚠ rejected as evidence

US No 5097545A

Patent⚠ rejected as evidence

US No 5729844A

Patent⚠ rejected as evidence

S No 2008060128A1

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 8(1)Article 6(1)Article 6(2)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • Applicant argued the RCD lacked novelty and individual character and that its main features were solely technically dictated, relying on French design D1 and several patent documents.
  • Holder filed no substantive observations, surrendered the RCD in 2020, and did not respond after the applicant requested a final decision despite the surrender.
  • The Division rejected the Article 8(1) claim because the alleged functional features were not proven to be solely dictated by technical function and aesthetic choices remained possible.
  • The Division found D1 sufficiently disclosed and creating the same overall impression, so the RCD lacked individual character; invalidity was upheld and costs awarded against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila CELISOVA
  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO
  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI - ALOISI

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

06.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131404

vs Jiahe Lin

2026-05-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128578

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128655

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128637

vs Washtower IP B.V.

2026-05-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000128735

vs OÜ REPSTON

2026-04-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000129372

vs Xuefang Cai

2026-03-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000130973

vs Højer Møbler A/S

2026-03-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068
000130975

vs Højer Møbler A/S

2026-03-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)068