DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008445852-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2021-11-05

000116167

Contested design: 008445852-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld, the contested Community design No 008445852-0001 is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text(de)

1. Dem Antrag auf Nichtigerklärung wird stattgegeben. 2. Das eingetragene Gemeinschaftsgeschmacksmuster Nr. 008445852-0001 wird für nichtig erklärt. 3. Die Inhaberin trägt die Kosten, die auf 750 EUR festgesetzt werden.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Liking Limitedvia PDF extraction

Hong Kong (HK)

#502C, 5/F Ho King Commercial Centre 2-16 Fa Yuen Street Mong Kok, Kowloon 99907, Sonderverwaltungszone Hongkong der Volksrepublik China

Represented by

Ratza & Ratza Srl

Holder · RCD owner

MAX Trader GmbH

Germany (DE)

Wilhelm-Beckmann-Straße 19, 45307 Essen, Deutschland

Prior art cited (2)

Web disclosure

social media posts showing a rowing machine design marketed as Skandika

instagram.com/skandika/; facebook.com/pg/skandika/photos/?ref=page_internal · Instagram and Facebook · disclosed 2019-11-28

Web disclosure

Amazon listing for "Skandika Styrke Water Rowing Machine"

ASIN B0824572JR · amazon.de · disclosed 2019-11-27

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character based on earlier online disclosures of the same rowing-machine design.
  • The applicant relied on Skandika Instagram and Facebook posts from late November and early December 2019 and an Amazon.de listing showing first availability on 27 November 2019.
  • The holder filed no observations, so the evidence of disclosure was unrebutted and the Division assessed individual character under Article 6.
  • The Division found the designs created the same overall impression on the informed user and declared the contested design invalid in full.

Deciding panel

  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO
  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberIvanka IVANOVA

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
deGermanoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

21.02

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131885

vs Zhenkai Cui

2026-04-30REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129622

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129681

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000126976

vs Dohány Kft.

2026-04-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131547

vs Brandworl Management Co., Limited

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131507

vs Shenzhen Chenyu New Energy Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-03-31REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130128

vs joboo GmbH

2026-02-03REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130086

vs CROSS BORDEP (HK) CO., LIMITED

2026-02-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218