DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 005835469-0002

Invalidity · first instance · 2021-11-12

000112302

Contested design: 005835469-0002

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must bear fixed costs of EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 005835469-0002 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

SPC «Aeromeh» Ltd.via PDF extraction

UA

Str. International, 37, Kreminna 92900, Ukraine

Holder · RCD owner

ASM Technology SP. Z O.O.via PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

Koralowa 17/37, 20-583 Lublin, Poland

Prior art cited (2)

Web disclosureD1

CAD 30 / SAD-30 separator with cyclone

www.iuriagui.ro (Wayback Machine) · Wayback Machine Internet Archive · disclosed 2018-07-24

National designD2

CAD 7 model with cyclone

UA 25316 · Register of Patents of Ukraine · disclosed 2013-08-27

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)Article 6(2)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • Applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character based mainly on earlier separator designs D1 and D2 disclosed before 27 November 2018.
  • Holder argued the compared separators were not identical and pointed to differences in doors, control lever position, cyclone construction, frame shape, and other technical features.
  • The Division accepted disclosure of D1 and D2, found the designer's freedom not substantially limited, and held that the many shared features dominated the minor differences.
  • The contested design produced the same overall impression as D1, lacked individual character under Article 6 CDR, and was declared invalid.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila CELISOVA
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberRasa BARAKAUSKIENE

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

15.0315.99

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000132204

vs Baofeng LIU

2026-05-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)158
000132185

vs Baofeng LIU

2026-05-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)158
000132064

vs Han Sheng

2026-05-06REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)158
000131827

vs linbo GAO

2026-04-28REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)158
000131826

vs linbo GAO

2026-04-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)158
000131787

vs linbo GAO

2026-04-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)158
000131088

vs ZhiAo Zhou

2026-03-18REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)158
000129841

vs Suzhou Kingbow Electrical Appliances Co., Ltd

2026-01-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)158