DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008210025-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2021-11-12

000114708

Contested design: 008210025-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 0082100250001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Jianping Chenvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

No. 21, Xiayuanpu, Xianglan Village, Xiadu Township, Shanghang County, Fujian Province, People’s Republic of China

Represented by

Ákos Süle

Holder · RCD owner

Zhuhai Boyeezon Technology Co., Ltd.

China (CN)

Room 508, 5th Floor, Precision Workshop, No. 2 Shengli Road, Sanzao Town, Jinwan District, Zhuhai, Guangdong 519000, People’s Republic of China

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

Amazon listing for labelling tapes / tape replacement cartridges for DYMO LetraTag

ASIN B07QNJTHXW · amazon.com · disclosed 2019-05-05

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character based on an earlier product listing for label-printer cartridges disclosed on amazon.com before the priority date.
  • The holder argued the amazon.com evidence could not reasonably become known in the EU trade circles and that printer-cartridge shape constraints made the cited design sufficiently different.
  • The Invalidity Division accepted the amazon.com listing and related images as a prior disclosure under Article 7(1) CDR and rejected the holder’s accessibility objections.
  • Comparing the visible features and overall impression, the Division found no material differences for the informed user, so the contested design lacked individual character and was invalidated.

Deciding panel

  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberRasa BARAKAUSKIENĖ
  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

18.02

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000114761

vs Zhuhai Boyeezon Technology co., Ltd

2021-11-04REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)188
000114721

vs Zhuhai Boyeezon Technology co., Ltd

2021-11-04REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)188
000124336

vs Radosław Pryba

2026-05-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)5
000132204

vs Baofeng LIU

2026-05-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)5
000132264

vs SHANDONG QIYUE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION TECHNOLOGY CO.,LTD

2026-05-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)5
000132185

vs Baofeng LIU

2026-05-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)5
000130164

vs Moritz Neugebauer

2026-05-22REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)5
000131404

vs Jiahe Lin

2026-05-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)5