DesignVerdict
← Back to search
Contested design 015090059-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2026-06-23

000130143

Contested design: 015090059-0001

EUDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld and EU design No 015090059-0001 is declared invalid; the holder bears costs of EUR 720.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered EU design No 015090059-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 720.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €720

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Zbigniew Zientekvia PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

Zawada, Poland

Holder · RCD owner

Marek Lisiecki

Poland (PL)

Gostynin, Poland

Represented by

Joanna Kluczewska-Strojny

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

Solar panel profile

Facebook profile 'Ecomar1ml', www.facebook.com, post dated 03/05/2022 · Facebook (www.facebook.com), profile 'Ecomar1ml' · disclosed 2022-05-03

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(a)Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 4(2)Article 5Article 6Article 8(1)

Argument summary

  • Applicant argued that the contested solar panel profile design (filed 15/01/2025) was identical to a prior solar panel profile self-disclosed by the holder on Facebook (profile 'Ecomar1ml') on 03/05/2022, well before the filing date, invoking grounds including lack of novelty and individual character under the EUDR.
  • Holder challenged the reliability of the Facebook evidence as imprecise and unverifiable, and argued the strict identity threshold under Article 5(2) EUDR was not met because the informed user could discern differences in lines, grooves, chambers, and proportions.
  • Division found the Facebook printout sufficient proof of disclosure; the two solar panel profile designs coincide in all visual characteristics including cross-section shape, proportions, multi-chamber interiors, functional grooves, and parallel geometry; no material differences were identified.
  • Application upheld; contested EU design No 015090059-0001 declared invalid for lack of novelty under Article 5 EUDR; no need to examine other grounds.

Deciding panel

  • MemberEnrico D'ERRICO
  • MemberGailé SAKALAITE-ORLOVSKIENE
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

23.03

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000132264

vs SHANDONG QIYUE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION TECHNOLOGY CO.,LTD

2026-05-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000131884

vs Zhaoqing Mikasi Home Hardware Co., LTD

2026-03-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000130601

vs Zhou Canbin

2026-01-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000127275

vs GRZEGORZ PIĄTEK PHU "TOP SERVIS"

2025-09-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000128177

vs DECATHLON

2025-08-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000126775

vs Ecomsoul Pro SRL

2025-07-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
0001267152025-07-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000128196

vs Rafał Sowa

2025-07-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238