DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 015057959-0002

Invalidity · first instance · 2025-09-17

000127275

Contested design: 015057959-0002

CDRmedium-confidence extraction

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested EU design is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 720.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered EU design No 0150667600001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 720.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €720

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Societe Bic, société anonymevia PDF extraction

France (FR)

Clichy, France

Represented by

In Concreto

Holder · RCD owner

Ying Caovia PDF extraction

China (CN)

Qinhuangdao City, Hebei Province, China

Prior art cited (1)

Prior use

BiC J26 maxi flint lighter in dark blue

BIC Australia leaflet, archived mybiclighter.com page, and BIC brochures/catalogues

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 6(2)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that the contested lighter lacked novelty and individual character because its long-used BiC maxi lighter had been publicly disclosed for years through sales, catalogues, brochures, and its website.
  • It also argued that the flame-adjustment slot was purely technical and should not affect the comparison; the holder filed no observations in response.
  • The Division accepted the combined affidavit, leaflet, website archive, and catalogue evidence as proving public disclosure of the prior BiC lighter before the filing date.
  • It found the designs shared the same overall shape, proportions, and hood elements, and that the contested design created the same overall impression on the informed user.
  • The application was upheld, the contested design was declared invalid for lack of individual character, and costs of EUR 720 were awarded against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberCarlos MATEO PÉREZ
  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberEmmanuel COLLIN

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

23.03

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000132264

vs SHANDONG QIYUE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION TECHNOLOGY CO.,LTD

2026-05-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000131884

vs Zhaoqing Mikasi Home Hardware Co., LTD

2026-03-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000130601

vs Zhou Canbin

2026-01-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000128177

vs DECATHLON

2025-08-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000126775

vs Ecomsoul Pro SRL

2025-07-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
0001267152025-07-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000128196

vs Rafał Sowa

2025-07-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
0001272962025-06-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238