DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008220313-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2021-11-17

000115846

Contested design: 008220313-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 008220313-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Hongli Zhangvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

No. 223, Group 3, Luojia VillageTaicun Town, Xunyi County, Shaanxi Province, People’s Republic of China

Represented by

Tong Yang Slu

Holder · RCD owner

ShenZhen RiYueZe Technology Co., LTD

China (CN)

302, Building A, Hekan Industrial park, No. 41, Wuhe S Rd, BanTian Street, LongGang, Shenzhen, People’s Republic of China

Represented by

Metida

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

Fitness Hula Hoop for Weight Loss

ASIN B0895J1SVC · Amazon.de · disclosed 2020-05-26

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5(1)(b)Article 7

Argument summary

  • Applicant argued the contested hoop design lacked novelty and individual character because earlier registered and unregistered designs had been disclosed before filing.
  • Applicant relied on an Amazon.de product listing for a 'Fitness Hula Hoop for Weight Loss' with ASIN B0895J1SVC, available since 26 May 2020.
  • Holder filed no observations in response to the invalidity application.
  • The Division found the Amazon listing sufficiently proved disclosure and that any differences between the designs were immaterial, so the contested design was not new.
  • The application was upheld, the design was declared invalid in full, and costs were awarded against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO
  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI-ALOISI
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

21.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131885

vs Zhenkai Cui

2026-04-30REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129622

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129681

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000126976

vs Dohány Kft.

2026-04-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131547

vs Brandworl Management Co., Limited

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131507

vs Shenzhen Chenyu New Energy Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-03-31REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130128

vs joboo GmbH

2026-02-03REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130086

vs CROSS BORDEP (HK) CO., LIMITED

2026-02-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218