DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 007761895-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2021-11-23

000112521

Contested design: 007761895-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld and Registered Community design No 007761895-0001 is declared invalid.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 007761895-0001 is declared invalid.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Jürgen Heckelsmüllervia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Ottobeurer Straße 15, 87784 Westerheim, Germany

Represented by

Reiner Helge

Holder · RCD owner

Michał Cukrowski

Poland (PL)

Ul. Wybickiego 72/6, 87-100 Toruń, Poland

Represented by

Katarzyna Natalia Krupa-Lipińska

Prior art cited (1)

Registered RCDD1

grating

RCD No 005301595-0001 · Community Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2018-07-02

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • Applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character over earlier RCD D1, arguing the designs were effectively identical in their essential grating features.
  • Holder argued the contested design differed in chamber count, pattern, openings, embossments and connectors, and said technical constraints for airfield gratings limited design freedom.
  • The Division found D1 validly disclosed, identified an informed user familiar with gratings, and considered the designer had broad freedom despite functional requirements.
  • It held the differences would require detailed inspection and did not change the overall impression, so the contested design lacked individual character and was invalidated.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberRasa BARAKAUSKIENĖ

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

25.02

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000112484

vs Michał Cukrowski

2021-10-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(d), Art 25(1)(b)2510
000129804

vs Mirosław Mytnik StudioDelta.pl

2026-05-06REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000129781

vs SHANGHAI KENDA INDUSTRIAL CO., LTD.

2026-02-09REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000126955

vs Decora S.A.

2026-01-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000129761

vs Shanghai Kenda Industrial Co.,Ltd.

2025-11-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000127177

vs Hermanus Johannes Matheus Verdegaal

2025-10-14REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000129361

vs Xiaoxia LI

2025-10-09REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000129266

vs Taiyuan Jiuchangsheng Trading Co., Ltd.

2025-10-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258