DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008470850-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2021-11-30

000116086

Contested design: 008470850-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holders must pay the applicant’s fixed costs of EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 0084708500001 is declared invalid. 3. The holders bear the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Nantong Suning Environmental Protection Technology Co. Ltdvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

Room 1001, Building 12, Dongjing New Town, Nantong 226000, People’s Republic of China

Represented by

Maria Iakovou Ioannidou

Holder · RCD owner

Giovanni Consolivia PDF extraction

Italy (IT)

Via dell’ Industria n. 19, 70043 Fasano, Italy

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

Podoy Dust Cyclone Collector

ASIN B08 7CS DPLW · US Amazon retail portal · disclosed 2020-04-21

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • Applicant argued the contested dust-collector filter design lacked novelty and individual character because a Podoy Dust Cyclone Collector had already been marketed before the filing date.
  • The holders were invited to respond but filed no observations.
  • The Division accepted the Amazon printouts as sufficient evidence of disclosure on 21/04/2020 and treated hyperlink-only evidence as insufficient by itself.
  • Comparing the visible features, the Division found the designs created the same overall impression on the informed user and the contested design lacked individual character.
  • The application was upheld, the contested design was declared invalid, and costs were awarded against the holders.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila CELISOVA
  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO
  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI – ALOISI

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

15.05

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000132204

vs Baofeng LIU

2026-05-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)158
000132185

vs Baofeng LIU

2026-05-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)158
000132064

vs Han Sheng

2026-05-06REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)158
000131827

vs linbo GAO

2026-04-28REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)158
000131826

vs linbo GAO

2026-04-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)158
000131787

vs linbo GAO

2026-04-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)158
000131088

vs ZhiAo Zhou

2026-03-18REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)158
000129841

vs Suzhou Kingbow Electrical Appliances Co., Ltd

2026-01-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)158