Invalidity · first instance · 2021-12-02
000115084
Contested design: 008341838-0002
Outcome
The invalidity application is rejected, and the applicant must pay the holder’s costs fixed at EUR 400.
Show verbatim operative text
1. The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered Community design No 0083418380002 is rejected. 2. The applicant bears the holder’s costs, fixed at EUR 400.
CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400
Parties
Applicant · invalidity challenger
Dorel Vasile Popvia PDF extraction
Romania (RO)
Bihorului 5 street, 455300 Simleu Silvaniei, Romania
Holder · RCD owner
AirTrack Factory HQ BV
Netherlands (NL)
Bijsterhuizen 1178, 6546 AS Nijmegen, Netherlands
Represented by
Prior art cited (1)
tent for camping
Romanian design registration No 022495 · Official Intellectual Property Bulletin (Romania) · disclosed 2020-07-31
Legal grounds invoked
Argument summary
- ›The applicant relied on Romanian design registration No 022495, arguing conflict with a prior design and lack of novelty and individual character for the contested camping tent.
- ›The holder said the applicant had not properly substantiated the claimed grounds and that the compared designs, shown in different formats, created a different overall impression.
- ›The Division found Article 25(1)(d) CDR inapplicable because the Romanian design had been made public before the contested RCD filing date, so it was not a prior design for that ground.
- ›On individual character, the Division accepted disclosure of the Romanian design but found visible differences in doors, windows, protrusions, tunnel entrance, and wall structure sufficient to create a different overall impression.
- ›The application was rejected in full and the applicant was ordered to pay the holder’s representation costs of EUR 400.
Deciding panel
- MemberLudmila CELISOVA
- MemberElisabetta FERRARO
- MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI - ALOISI
Decision files
| Language | Type | Source link |
|---|---|---|
| esespañol (es) | machine translated | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
| frfrançais (fr) | machine translated | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
| ititaliano (it) | machine translated | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
| enEnglish | original | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
Locarno classes
Similar decisions
Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.
| Case | Date | Outcome | Shared grounds | Locarno | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 000115081 vs AirTrack Factory HQ BV | 2021-12-02 | — | Art 25(1)(d), Art 25(1)(b) | 21 | 9 |
| 000128896 vs Sc Pitikot Store Srl | 2025-08-18 | — | Art 25(1)(b) | 21 | 7 |
| 000124438 vs АУТДОР ПЛЕЙ | 2025-04-03 | — | Art 25(1)(b) | 21 | 7 |
| 000126927 vs Jiujiang Storm E-Commerce Co., Ltd. | 2025-03-25 | — | Art 25(1)(b) | 21 | 7 |
| 000121617 vs nano Vo Sp. z o.o. | 2024-05-29 | — | Art 25(1)(b) | 21 | 7 |
| 000121616 vs nano Vo Sp. z o.o. | 2024-05-29 | — | Art 25(1)(b) | 21 | 7 |
| 000121615 vs nano Vo Sp. z o.o. | 2024-05-10 | — | Art 25(1)(b) | 21 | 7 |
| 000114244 vs UTILIS | 2024-01-09 | — | Art 25(1)(b) | 21 | 7 |