DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 005228327-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2025-04-03

000124438

Contested design: 005228327-0001

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application is rejected, and the applicant must pay the holder's fixed costs of EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered Community design No 005228327-0001 is rejected. 2. The applicant bears the holder’s costs, fixed at EUR 400.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Binzhou Nets Tribe Co., Ltd.via PDF extraction

China (CN)

Lizhuang Industrial Park, Binzhou, Shandong province, China

Represented by

Biliana Antranik Magardichian

Holder · RCD owner

Аутдор Плейvia PDF extraction

Bulgaria (BG)

ул.Александър Геров №15, 1618 София, Bulgaria

Represented by

RP Partners Ltd.

Prior art cited (1)

Utility model

Honeycomb Mesh Children's Playground

CN 204 121 680 U · Chinese patent database · disclosed 2015-01-28

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • Applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character over an earlier Chinese registration for a honeycomb-mesh children's playground.
  • Holder argued the contested design was new and distinctive, pointing to differences in metal structure, geometric shape, and the number, size, and placement of the mesh elements.
  • The Division accepted that the earlier Chinese document disclosed prior art under Article 7(1) CDR before the filing date of the contested design.
  • Comparing the designs, the Division found clear differences in overall shape, suspension points, number of yo-yos, colours, and visible mesh features, creating a different overall impression.
  • The application was rejected because the contested design retained individual character and novelty; the applicant was ordered to bear the holder's costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberEmmanuel COLLIN
  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

21.03

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000128896

vs Sc Pitikot Store Srl

2025-08-18Art 25(1)(b)217
000126927

vs Jiujiang Storm E-Commerce Co., Ltd.

2025-03-25Art 25(1)(b)217
000121617

vs nano Vo Sp. z o.o.

2024-05-29Art 25(1)(b)217
000121616

vs nano Vo Sp. z o.o.

2024-05-29Art 25(1)(b)217
000121615

vs nano Vo Sp. z o.o.

2024-05-10Art 25(1)(b)217
000114244

vs UTILIS

2024-01-09Art 25(1)(b)217
000121427

vs Jinhua Baiwei Plastic Products Co., Ltd.

2023-11-15Art 25(1)(b)217
000119359

vs TECH LIVING LIMITED

2023-06-12Art 25(1)(b)217