DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008456099-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2023-11-15

000121427

Contested design: 008456099-0001

CDRmedium-confidence extraction

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application is rejected, and the holder is ordered to bear costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered Community design No 008456099-0001 is rejected. 2. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 400.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Fu Yongpingvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

Pengtian Township, Linchuan District, Fuzhou City, Jiangxi Province, China

Holder · RCD owner

Jinhua Baiwei Plastic Products Co., Ltd.

China (CN)

No. 55, Xiangyang Road, Xinmei Village, Yuandong Township, Jindong District, Zhejiang Province, Jinhua City 321000, China

Represented by

Joanna Dargiewicz

Prior art cited (1)

National design⚠ rejected as evidence

recreational flotation device

Canadian Design No 163572 · DesignView / Canadian Intellectual Property Office · disclosed 2016-02-23

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • Applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character based on Canadian Design No 163572 for a recreational flotation device.
  • Holder filed no observations in response to the invalidity application.
  • The Division held the DesignView extract and enlarged images did not establish a solid, objective prior disclosure date under Article 7(1) CDR.
  • Because disclosure of the prior design was not proven, the Article 25(1)(b) challenge failed and the invalidity application was rejected.

Deciding panel

  • MemberEnrico D'ERRICO
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

21.02

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000128896

vs Sc Pitikot Store Srl

2025-08-18Art 25(1)(b)217
000124438

vs АУТДОР ПЛЕЙ

2025-04-03Art 25(1)(b)217
000126927

vs Jiujiang Storm E-Commerce Co., Ltd.

2025-03-25Art 25(1)(b)217
000121616

vs nano Vo Sp. z o.o.

2024-05-29Art 25(1)(b)217
000121617

vs nano Vo Sp. z o.o.

2024-05-29Art 25(1)(b)217
000121615

vs nano Vo Sp. z o.o.

2024-05-10Art 25(1)(b)217
000114244

vs UTILIS

2024-01-09Art 25(1)(b)217
000119359

vs TECH LIVING LIMITED

2023-06-12Art 25(1)(b)217