DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008278287-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2021-12-08

000116148

Contested design: 008278287-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld and Registered Community design No 008278287-0001 is declared invalid.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 008278287-0001 is declared invalid.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Wenyan Livia PDF extraction

China (CN)

No. 27, Shaxia village, Minzhi Street, Longhua District, Shenzhen, People's Republic of China

Represented by

Ákos Süle

Holder · RCD owner

Shenzhen Xinyi Innovation Co., Ltd.via PDF extraction

China (CN)

405 Bldg. 37, Yintian Ind. Zone, Yantian Community, Xixiang St., Baoan Dist., Shenzhen, People's Republic of China

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosureAnnex 13

Amazon offer for a square pop bubble fidget toy with small pokable bubbles

ASIN B08N4R66S4 · Amazon website (amazon.de) · disclosed 2020-11-09

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that the contested toy design lacked novelty and individual character over prior art, relying in particular on an Amazon listing for a square pop bubble fidget toy.
  • The summary of parties' arguments sets out the applicant's submissions only and records no substantive holder response.
  • The Division accepted the Amazon listing as sufficient evidence of disclosure before the filing date under Article 7(1) CDR.
  • Comparing the shapes, bubbles and colour, the Division found the only difference was a slight shade variation and held the designs identical in all material respects.
  • The application was upheld because the contested design lacked novelty and was declared invalid in full.

Deciding panel

  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO
  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI-ALOISI
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

21.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131885

vs Zhenkai Cui

2026-04-30REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129622

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129681

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000126976

vs Dohány Kft.

2026-04-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131547

vs Brandworl Management Co., Limited

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131507

vs Shenzhen Chenyu New Energy Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-03-31REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130128

vs joboo GmbH

2026-02-03REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130086

vs CROSS BORDEP (HK) CO., LIMITED

2026-02-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218