DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008278287-0002

Invalidity · first instance · 2021-12-08

000116166

Contested design: 008278287-0002

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 008278287-0002 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Wenyan Livia PDF extraction

China (CN)

No. 27, Shaxia village, Minzhi Street, Longhua District, Shenzhen, People’s Republic of China

Represented by

Ákos Süle

Holder · RCD owner

Shenzhen Xinyi Innovation Co., Ltd.via PDF extraction

China (CN)

405 Bldg. 37, Yintian Ind. Zone, Yantian Community, Xixiang St., Baoan Dist., Shenzhen, People’s Republic of China

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosureAnnex 1

Amazon offer for a "Vcostone push pop bubble fidget toy" in the shape of a disc with pokable bubbles

https://www.amazon.de; ASIN B08N437MM7 · Amazon · disclosed 2020-11-09

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that the contested toy design lacked novelty and individual character in light of earlier prior art.
  • The applicant relied on an Amazon listing dated 9 November 2020 for a disc-shaped push-pop bubble fidget toy with ASIN B08N437MM7.
  • The holder filed no observations in response to the invalidity application.
  • The Division accepted the Amazon offer as sufficient online disclosure before the filing date and found the compared designs identical apart from an immaterial shade difference.
  • The application was upheld because the contested design lacked novelty and was therefore declared invalid.

Deciding panel

  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO
  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI-ALOISI
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

21.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131885

vs Zhenkai Cui

2026-04-30REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129622

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129681

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000126976

vs Dohány Kft.

2026-04-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131547

vs Brandworl Management Co., Limited

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131507

vs Shenzhen Chenyu New Energy Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-03-31REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130128

vs joboo GmbH

2026-02-03REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130086

vs CROSS BORDEP (HK) CO., LIMITED

2026-02-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218