DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008254346-0002

Invalidity · first instance · 2021-12-20

000116050

Contested design: 008254346-0002

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must bear the applicant's costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 0082543460002 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Portbird UGvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Ebereschenweg 23, 50767 Köln, Germany

Represented by

Edmund Lothar Fritz

Holder · RCD owner

Zhongshan Taozuo Electric Technology Co., Ltdvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

One of the 3rd floors of the Bldg 3, No. 22, Fuqing 1st Road, Yongxing Industrial Zone, Henglan Town, Zhongshan City, People's Republic of China

Represented by

Ákos Süle

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosureA2/A5

'corner bright light' floor lamp designed by Scott Klinker

Instagram profile 'scottklinkerdesign' and www.scottklinker.com · Instagram / Scott Klinker website · disclosed 2018-05-24

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 6(2)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character based on the earlier 'corner bright light' floor lamp disclosed online before the filing date.
  • The holder filed no observations and did not dispute the claimed online disclosure of the prior design.
  • The Division accepted attachments A2 and A5 as proving prior internet disclosure and found average designer freedom for floor lamps.
  • The contested lamp reproduced the prior design's overall shape and proportions, so it lacked individual character and the application was upheld.

Deciding panel

  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO
  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL
  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI - ALOISI

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

26.05

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130945

vs Space Copenhagen Design ApS

2026-05-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131284

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131264

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131304

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131245

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131366

vs DANMAR TECH SL

2026-04-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131247

vs chao zhai

2026-04-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000129540

vs Ningbo Wilder Outdoor Products Co., Ltd.

2026-03-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268