DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008367353-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2021-12-20

000116206

Contested design: 008367353-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant’s costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 0083673530001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Portbird UGvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Ebereschenweg 23, 50767 Köln, Germany

Represented by

Edmund Lothar Fritz

Holder · RCD owner

Gao, Zemin

China (CN)

No. 30034, Shuicaogou Village, Tuban Town, Lin County, Shanxi 033299, People’s Republic of China

Represented by

Lawgical, S.L.P

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

Scott Klinker "corner bright light" floor lamp

Instagram profile "scottklinkerdesign" and www.scottklinker.com · Instagram and Scott Klinker website · disclosed 2018-05-24

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 6(2)Article 7Article 70(1)Article 79(7)(f)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying on the earlier “corner bright light” disclosed online before 23 December 2020.
  • The holder filed no observations and did not dispute the disclosure evidence.
  • The Division accepted the Instagram and website materials as prior disclosure under Article 7 and treated the earlier lamp as the relevant prior design.
  • It found the contested lamp reproduced the prior design’s overall shape and proportions, with only minor colour and cord differences insufficient to change overall impression.
  • The application was upheld because the contested design lacked individual character, and the holder was ordered to bear costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO
  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL
  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI – ALOISI

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

26.05

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130945

vs Space Copenhagen Design ApS

2026-05-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131284

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131264

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131304

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131245

vs Venture MK UG (haftungsbeschränkt)

2026-04-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131366

vs DANMAR TECH SL

2026-04-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000131247

vs chao zhai

2026-04-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268
000129540

vs Ningbo Wilder Outdoor Products Co., Ltd.

2026-03-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)268