DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008558431-0002

Invalidity · first instance · 2021-12-20

000116228

Contested design: 008558431-0002

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant's fixed costs of EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 0085584310002 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the applicant's costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Qinghao Linvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

17 Shagang Lane, Chengnan Community, Fengxiang Sub-district, Chenghai District, Shantou, Guangdong 515800, People's Republic of China

Represented by

Zhengnan Gong

Holder · RCD owner

Shenzhen Jiamite Trading Co., Ltd.

China (CN)

606609, Building E, No. 416, Huarong Road, Langkou Community, Dalang Street, Longhua District, Shenzhen, People's Republic of China

Represented by

Isabelle Bertaux

Prior art cited (3)

National designAnnex 1

Toy knitting machine

CN 303843243 S · CNIPA patent database · disclosed 2016-09-07

Web disclosure

same knitting machine presented on the YouTube portal

YouTube

Prior use

same or highly similar knitting machines sold by other business entities

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying on an earlier Chinese design patent, a YouTube disclosure, and earlier market sales of similar knitting machines.
  • The holder filed no observations in reply to the invalidity application.
  • The Division accepted disclosure of the Chinese design patent from 7 September 2016 and found the contested design practically identical to that prior design, with only negligible differences.
  • The contested design lacked individual character under Article 6(1)(b) CDR, so the invalidity application was upheld and the design was declared invalid.

Deciding panel

  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO
  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL
  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI – ALOISI

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

15.06

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000132185

vs Baofeng LIU

2026-05-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)158
000132204

vs Baofeng LIU

2026-05-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)158
000132064

vs Han Sheng

2026-05-06REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)158
000131827

vs linbo GAO

2026-04-28REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)158
000131826

vs linbo GAO

2026-04-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)158
000131787

vs linbo GAO

2026-04-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)158
000131088

vs ZhiAo Zhou

2026-03-18REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)158
000129841

vs Suzhou Kingbow Electrical Appliances Co., Ltd

2026-01-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)158