DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008558431-0003

Invalidity · first instance · 2021-12-20

000116229

Contested design: 008558431-0003

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 0085584310003 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Qinghao Linvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

17 Shagang Lane, Chengnan Community, Fengxiang Sub-district, Chenghai District, Shantou, Guangdong 515800, People's Republic of China

Represented by

Zhengnan Gong

Holder · RCD owner

Shenzhen Jiamite Trading Co., Ltd.

China (CN)

606609, Building E, No. 416, Huarong Road, Langkou Community, Dalang Street, Longhua District, Shenzhen, People's Republic of China

Represented by

Isabelle Bertaux

Prior art cited (3)

National designAnnex 1.A

Hand needle wool knitting machine

CN 305587005 S · CNIPA patent database · disclosed 2020-02-04

Web disclosure

same knitting machine design presented on the YouTube portal before the filing date

YouTube · YouTube

Prior use

same knitting machine design sold by other business entities before the filing date

other business entities

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • Applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying mainly on earlier disclosures of the same knitting machine, especially Chinese design patent CN 305587005 S published on 2020-02-04.
  • Holder filed no observations in response to the invalidity application.
  • The Division accepted Annex 1 as a prior disclosure under Article 7 and found the designer had enough freedom that minor differences would not change the overall impression.
  • The contested design was virtually identical to the prior design, so it lacked individual character and was declared invalid, with costs awarded against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO
  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL
  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI – ALOISI

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

15.06

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000132185

vs Baofeng LIU

2026-05-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)158
000132204

vs Baofeng LIU

2026-05-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)158
000132064

vs Han Sheng

2026-05-06REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)158
000131827

vs linbo GAO

2026-04-28REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)158
000131826

vs linbo GAO

2026-04-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)158
000131787

vs linbo GAO

2026-04-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)158
000131088

vs ZhiAo Zhou

2026-03-18REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)158
000129841

vs Suzhou Kingbow Electrical Appliances Co., Ltd

2026-01-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)158