DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 005301595-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2022-01-20

000113241

Contested design: 005301595-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the registered Community design No. 0053015950001 is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text(de)

1. Dem Antrag auf Nichtigerklärung wird stattgegeben. 2. Das eingetragene Gemeinschaftsgeschmacksmuster Nr. 0053015950001 wird für nichtig erklärt. 3. Der Inhaber trägt die Kosten, die auf 750 EUR festgesetzt werden.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

TPP Thermoplastics Polska sp. z o.o.via PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

Unii Europejskiej 6, 86-050 Solec Kujawski, Poland

Represented by

Katarzyna Natalia Krupa-Lininkska

Holder · RCD owner

Jürgen Heckelsmüller

Germany (DE)

Ottobeurer Straße 15, 87784 Westerheim, Deutschland

Represented by

Reiner Helge

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosureD1

Facebook post with photos showing installation of gridwork at the Krakow Aeroclub airfield in Pobiednik Wielki, Poland

Facebook · disclosed 2012-09-12

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that the contested grid design was not a valid design because its views were inconsistent and, in any event, lacked novelty and individual character over earlier disclosures D1 to D3.
  • The holder replied that the views were consistent, the contested design was new and individual, and Facebook or other internet materials did not reliably prove prior disclosure.
  • The Division accepted the Facebook post D1 as a public disclosure before filing, found at least average designer freedom for ground grids, and considered the shared checkerboard grid structure decisive.
  • It held that any differences were minor and did not alter the overall impression, so the contested RCD lacked individual character and was declared invalid; the remaining grounds were not examined.

Deciding panel

  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO
  • MemberIvanka IVANOVA

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
deGermanoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

25.02

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000129804

vs Mirosław Mytnik StudioDelta.pl

2026-05-06REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000129781

vs SHANGHAI KENDA INDUSTRIAL CO., LTD.

2026-02-09REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000126955

vs Decora S.A.

2026-01-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000129761

vs Shanghai Kenda Industrial Co.,Ltd.

2025-11-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000127177

vs Hermanus Johannes Matheus Verdegaal

2025-10-14REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000129361

vs Xiaoxia LI

2025-10-09REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000129266

vs Taiyuan Jiuchangsheng Trading Co., Ltd.

2025-10-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258
000124780

vs D.ELLINAS FACTORY PRODUCTS LTD

2025-06-25REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)258