DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 007774237-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2022-02-04

000116568

Contested design: 007774237-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant's fixed costs of EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 0077742370001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Hangzhou Kiss Kiss Fish Technology Co., Ltd.via PDF extraction

China (CN)

Room 27, 2nd floor, Building 3, No. 2988 Moganshan Rd., Liangzhu St., Yuhang Dist., Hangzhou, Zhejiang, People’s Republic of China

Holder · RCD owner

Shenzhen Diaobo Technology Co., Ltd.

China (CN)

Rm. 1201, No. 3, Lane 2, Area B, Shangnian Vil., Shangcun Community, Gongming St., Guangming Dist., Shenzhen, Guangdong, People’s Republic of China

Represented by

Marcella Clarke

Prior art cited (2)

Web disclosure

thermo cup

https://item.jd.com · jd.com

Web disclosure

thermo cup

www.zhihu.com · zhihu.com

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that the contested thermo cup lacked novelty and individual character because the same cup had already been disclosed online and sold worldwide before filing.
  • The holder was invited to respond to the invalidity application but filed no observations.
  • The Division accepted the jd.com screenshots as sufficient evidence of prior disclosure before the filing date and found no relevant design differences apart from colour.
  • The contested design created the same overall impression as the prior cup, so the application was upheld and the design declared invalid.

Deciding panel

  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL
  • MemberLudmila CELISOVA
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

07.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131632

vs DETECTALIA EUROPE, S.L.U.

2026-05-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000129741

vs 2W ORGANIC

2026-05-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131788

vs Liu Xiaoxia

2026-05-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131628

vs Shenzhen Changhe Technology Co., Ltd

2026-04-30REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131704

vs Shenzhen Changhe Technology Co., Ltd

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131745

vs Huan Wang

2026-04-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000130924

vs SOHAI HOUSEWARES CO.,LTD.

2026-04-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131546

vs Foshan Changyuansheng Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-03-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078