DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 003934223-0015

Invalidity · first instance · 2022-03-01

000116131

Contested design: 003934223-0015

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 350 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 0039342230015 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 350.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €350

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

SC GOLD GLASS SRLvia PDF extraction

Romania (RO)

Str. Lt. Col. Dumitru Papazoglu, Nr. 60, Et.2, Ap. 10, Sector 3, 031203 Bucharest, Romania

Holder · RCD owner

Semir Raad Marokivia PDF extraction

Romania (RO)

str. Faurei nr. 5, bloc C9, sc. C, ap. 82, Bucuresti, Romania

Represented by

Claudia Monica Frisch

Prior art cited (1)

Catalog

Cleopatra Glass 'Morgan' mug shown on page 22 of the 2016/2017 catalogue

Model CP 1132G · Cleopatra Glass catalogue / website / Facebook

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • Applicant argued the contested mug lacked novelty and individual character because identical Morgan mugs had been marketed by Cleopatra Glass and sold to the applicant before the filing date.
  • Holder filed no observations in response to the invalidity application.
  • The Division found the Cleopatra Glass catalogue, website, Facebook post, and shipping documents proved public disclosure in 2016 of the prior Morgan mug design.
  • Comparing the contested design with model CP 1132G, the Division found the designs almost identical and held that the contested mug lacked individual character.

Deciding panel

  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI - ALOISI
  • MemberLudmila CELISOVA
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

07.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131632

vs DETECTALIA EUROPE, S.L.U.

2026-05-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000129741

vs 2W ORGANIC

2026-05-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131788

vs Liu Xiaoxia

2026-05-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131628

vs Shenzhen Changhe Technology Co., Ltd

2026-04-30REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131704

vs Shenzhen Changhe Technology Co., Ltd

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131745

vs Huan Wang

2026-04-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000130924

vs SOHAI HOUSEWARES CO.,LTD.

2026-04-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078
000131546

vs Foshan Changyuansheng Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-03-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)078