DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008517106-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2022-03-03

000116867

Contested design: 008517106-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 0085171060001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Smoby Toys S.A.S.via PDF extraction

France (FR)

Lieu-dit Bourg-dessus, 39170 Lavans les Saint Claude, France

Holder · RCD owner

Yuyang Wang

China (CN)

No. 4, 1st Road, Dongguahu Industrial Zone, Huaize, Lianxia Town, Chenghai District, Shantou City, Guangdong Province, People's Republic of China

Represented by

Maria Iakovou Ioannidou

Prior art cited (3)

Catalog

prior racetrack design disclosed in a catalogue

Web disclosure

Smoby 180902WEB, FleXtreme Car Racing Track Starter Set

ASIN B08 8G1 9P8Z · www.amazon.de · disclosed 2020-06-26

Registered RCD

RCD No 0074240490007

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that the contested racetrack-part design lacked individual character over an earlier racetrack design disclosed in a catalogue and on Amazon, and also invoked an earlier RCD.
  • The holder filed no observations and did not contest disclosure, the prior art, or the similarity assessment.
  • The Division accepted the Amazon listing as sufficient proof that the earlier design was made available to the public before the contested design's filing and priority dates.
  • Given at least average designer freedom, minor differences in contour, pattern, and shade did not outweigh the many shared essential features and overall impression.
  • The Division found a lack of individual character under Article 6(1)(b) CDR, upheld the application, invalidated the contested design, and ordered costs against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO
  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberRasa BARAKAUSKIENÉ

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

21.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131885

vs Zhenkai Cui

2026-04-30REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129622

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129681

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000126976

vs Dohány Kft.

2026-04-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131547

vs Brandworl Management Co., Limited

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131507

vs Shenzhen Chenyu New Energy Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-03-31REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130128

vs joboo GmbH

2026-02-03REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130086

vs CROSS BORDEP (HK) CO., LIMITED

2026-02-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218