DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008486054-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2022-03-04

000116106

Contested design: 008486054-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 008486054-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Yang Chenvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

Room 302, Building A, Wenpu Garden, No.181 Haifu Road, Haicang District, Xiamen City, Fujian Province 361000, People’s Republic of China

Represented by

Valet Patent Services

Holder · RCD owner

Nian Chen

China (CN)

Room 2402, No.2, Hujin Third Street, Baiyun District, Guangzhou City, People’s Republic of China

Represented by

Ákos Süle

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosureEvidence D

Amazon offer for a flippy ring chain fidget bicycle chain toy

ASIN B08WYGLFH9 / https://www.amazon.de · Amazon.de · disclosed 2021-02-19

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character based on earlier Amazon-disclosed fidget chain designs.
  • The applicant relied in particular on Amazon evidence showing a product with ASIN B08WYGLFH9 offered since 19 February 2021.
  • The holder filed no observations in response to the invalidity application.
  • The Division accepted the Amazon disclosure under Article 7(1) CDR and found the earlier design identical to the contested design.
  • The application was upheld because the contested design lacked novelty, so the Division did not examine the individual-character ground further.

Deciding panel

  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO
  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI-ALOISI
  • MemberREBECCA SANTANA DAVIES

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

21.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131885

vs Zhenkai Cui

2026-04-30REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129622

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129681

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000126976

vs Dohány Kft.

2026-04-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131547

vs Brandworl Management Co., Limited

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131507

vs Shenzhen Chenyu New Energy Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-03-31REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130128

vs joboo GmbH

2026-02-03REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130086

vs CROSS BORDEP (HK) CO., LIMITED

2026-02-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218